The smile of victory | 2 Americas
North America USA Canada housekeeper Mexico Central America Costa Rica El Salvador housekeeper Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama Caribbean Cuba Haiti South America Colombia Ecuador Venezuela Bolivia Peru Argentina Brazil housekeeper Chile Paraguay Uruguay
N icolás Maduro housekeeper won (or at least did not lose) the referendum for or against his government administrative provisions of the elections on December 8th. And there is no doubt: if his victory has a face that belongs to Cleotilde Palomino, photographed while out laden with packages housekeeper from one of the shops Daka in which the government, militarily, lowered prices. We explain why.
If indeed the local elections of 8 December were a "plebiscite" - as the opposition leader Henrique Capriles had unequivocally (and very unwisely) housekeeper argued before housekeeper the vote - there can be no doubt Nicolás Maduro - designated heir, son and apostle of the deceased "supreme commander and eternal" Hugo Chávez - the plebiscite has won numerically. He won - albeit, as we shall see at a high cost - for the simple reason that the party-state government (Unificado Socialist housekeeper Party of Venezuela, housekeeper PSUV) and lists more or less clearly related housekeeper to the "oficialismo", have, national level, reported the most votes (just under a million, in fact) than those of the MUD (Mesa de unitad Democratic), extending up to 7-8 per cent (or even 10, according to the most sophisticated calculations) the margin of risicatissimo 1.4 per cent with which, in April, his son and an apostle of "El Cristo de los pobres redentor" had won (or "stolen", as claimed Capriles) the last (the first after the death of Chavez) elections presidential elections.
He won Maduro, that "plebiscite", and, of course, he lost Capriles, as clearly indicates the most detailed and objective analysis of the vote among the many that, these days, are gone while moving between opposing songs of victory that developed After a meticulous and hard work of sieve, Eugenio G. Martínez to the pages of "El Universal", housekeeper curiously (or perhaps not so curiously), one of the few publications that, at the end of a long process of co-optation and repression implemented by the government over the years, they can still call themselves " of opposition. " The numbers speak for themselves: Mud has, with its allies, housekeeper obtained 4,410,838 votes, compared with 5.26593 million capitalized by the PSUV and the like. For a total of 242 "alcaldias" (common) ended up in the hands of Chavista mayors, on behalf of the 76 won by the opposition. And the gap widens even more, reaching for the note to 10 percent, when - as very meticulously ago Martínez - distributed "affinity" votes (about 8 percent) achieved by formally independent lists.
Obvious question: housekeeper what drove Capriles in place along the way the banana peel of an appeal housekeeper to the plebiscite? As pointed out after the vote Luis Vicente Leon, director of Datanalisis, the leader of the opposition has actually chosen this path, not just a political miscalculation, but also the need for an objective: to motivate the disaffected vote against of local elections that, for many reasons, appeared devoid of any importance. The Chavism in fact, in recent years, systematically dismantled all forms of administrative decentralization through housekeeper the creation of a network of parallel power - that, still under development, so-called "comunas" housekeeper - firmly in the hands of the central government, and in fact alternative institutions (the "alcaldias", to be precise) that the Constitution (yes, the Constitution that Chávez's followers use as if it were waving Mao's little red book) very clearly states. housekeeper A process that, assuming (and continues to be) size even more brazen mockingly, where the winners are the opposition.
A few examples to better understand. In 2008, when Antonio Ledezma, a member housekeeper of the MUD won resoundingly, under the nose of the supreme leader, the race for the Alcaldia of Greater housekeeper Caracas (until then the most important entity's administrative capital), Hugo Chavez did not flinch. And, within a few days, created out of nothing (maybe miracles are not the ones that define holiness?), A "super-alcadía" to which the authority entrusted almost all tasks (with their funding) of the now superfluous institution fall into the hands of rival forces. Antonio Ledezma won then (and reclaiming the December 8) at the ballot housekeeper box. But the sole purpose of governing housekeeper an empty shell. housekeeper Just like an empty shell will rule in the coming years, the mayors of the opposition, last Sunday, have established themselves in practice in all the major cities of Venezuela. Why? Why Nicolás Maduro, following the "supreme" and "eternal" example of his father, has already p
North America USA Canada housekeeper Mexico Central America Costa Rica El Salvador housekeeper Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama Caribbean Cuba Haiti South America Colombia Ecuador Venezuela Bolivia Peru Argentina Brazil housekeeper Chile Paraguay Uruguay
N icolás Maduro housekeeper won (or at least did not lose) the referendum for or against his government administrative provisions of the elections on December 8th. And there is no doubt: if his victory has a face that belongs to Cleotilde Palomino, photographed while out laden with packages housekeeper from one of the shops Daka in which the government, militarily, lowered prices. We explain why.
If indeed the local elections of 8 December were a "plebiscite" - as the opposition leader Henrique Capriles had unequivocally (and very unwisely) housekeeper argued before housekeeper the vote - there can be no doubt Nicolás Maduro - designated heir, son and apostle of the deceased "supreme commander and eternal" Hugo Chávez - the plebiscite has won numerically. He won - albeit, as we shall see at a high cost - for the simple reason that the party-state government (Unificado Socialist housekeeper Party of Venezuela, housekeeper PSUV) and lists more or less clearly related housekeeper to the "oficialismo", have, national level, reported the most votes (just under a million, in fact) than those of the MUD (Mesa de unitad Democratic), extending up to 7-8 per cent (or even 10, according to the most sophisticated calculations) the margin of risicatissimo 1.4 per cent with which, in April, his son and an apostle of "El Cristo de los pobres redentor" had won (or "stolen", as claimed Capriles) the last (the first after the death of Chavez) elections presidential elections.
He won Maduro, that "plebiscite", and, of course, he lost Capriles, as clearly indicates the most detailed and objective analysis of the vote among the many that, these days, are gone while moving between opposing songs of victory that developed After a meticulous and hard work of sieve, Eugenio G. Martínez to the pages of "El Universal", housekeeper curiously (or perhaps not so curiously), one of the few publications that, at the end of a long process of co-optation and repression implemented by the government over the years, they can still call themselves " of opposition. " The numbers speak for themselves: Mud has, with its allies, housekeeper obtained 4,410,838 votes, compared with 5.26593 million capitalized by the PSUV and the like. For a total of 242 "alcaldias" (common) ended up in the hands of Chavista mayors, on behalf of the 76 won by the opposition. And the gap widens even more, reaching for the note to 10 percent, when - as very meticulously ago Martínez - distributed "affinity" votes (about 8 percent) achieved by formally independent lists.
Obvious question: housekeeper what drove Capriles in place along the way the banana peel of an appeal housekeeper to the plebiscite? As pointed out after the vote Luis Vicente Leon, director of Datanalisis, the leader of the opposition has actually chosen this path, not just a political miscalculation, but also the need for an objective: to motivate the disaffected vote against of local elections that, for many reasons, appeared devoid of any importance. The Chavism in fact, in recent years, systematically dismantled all forms of administrative decentralization through housekeeper the creation of a network of parallel power - that, still under development, so-called "comunas" housekeeper - firmly in the hands of the central government, and in fact alternative institutions (the "alcaldias", to be precise) that the Constitution (yes, the Constitution that Chávez's followers use as if it were waving Mao's little red book) very clearly states. housekeeper A process that, assuming (and continues to be) size even more brazen mockingly, where the winners are the opposition.
A few examples to better understand. In 2008, when Antonio Ledezma, a member housekeeper of the MUD won resoundingly, under the nose of the supreme leader, the race for the Alcaldia of Greater housekeeper Caracas (until then the most important entity's administrative capital), Hugo Chavez did not flinch. And, within a few days, created out of nothing (maybe miracles are not the ones that define holiness?), A "super-alcadía" to which the authority entrusted almost all tasks (with their funding) of the now superfluous institution fall into the hands of rival forces. Antonio Ledezma won then (and reclaiming the December 8) at the ballot housekeeper box. But the sole purpose of governing housekeeper an empty shell. housekeeper Just like an empty shell will rule in the coming years, the mayors of the opposition, last Sunday, have established themselves in practice in all the major cities of Venezuela. Why? Why Nicolás Maduro, following the "supreme" and "eternal" example of his father, has already p
No comments:
Post a Comment